Wednesday, October 27, 2010

How to be invisible in facebook chat and be visible only to a number of people?

Ok.. If you found my blog, you were probably thinking that it was not possible at first but it is.. It's possible to be invisible to only a specific number of people, poeple who are strangers who you just add up on fb without wanted to communicate with or if you just want to be online to your boyfriend or girlfriend, it can be done..just follow the simple steps..

1) Go to "account"
2) Go to "Edit friends"
3) Make a group for your:
4) Select the specific people you want to enter or put in that group. You do that by going to "edit list" beside their names in your friends list and checking what group you want them to join.
5) check your chat box.
6) You discover that your groups are in the chat box...
7) How to be online with only a specific group: the green light means your online to them, the grey option means you're offline to them, just drag your mouse to move the "switch". For example, if you have your group, "friends" online, only your friends who are in that group can see you online.. all the rest of the groups that you have your switch off won't be able to see you online.

Neat trick: You can select which groups you want to be on your fb chat just to this..
check the group you want to show up on your chat.. the people who belongs in the group you don't select will not see you online at all and those friends you did not select to be in any group will automatically be put in the "other friends" group in your chat box.(default group) so if you only just have that group switched offline, all the rest of your fb friends who are not in a group will not see you online.

Note: You can't see them if they are online though as well as they can't see you if you're online if you have that group on offline mode.

Simple right? try it..

Any questions just comment below..

Friday, October 22, 2010

Dirty, skinny, little alley cat, get u'r slimey paws of my property!

oh come on.. before u try to make a move on my man, make sure at least you can take the heat and the intimidation of my mere presence...hahaha Compared to our very good and very competent lawyer and judge professors in law school that we face everyday, a dirty, skinny, little, alley cat like you don't scare me...;) way challenge..

Thursday, October 21, 2010

funny m0ment with baby nate#fb

caught nate staring at my insurance b0ok with that really curious lo0k while i was studying. me: nahan ka sko law b0ok nate? pa.healthy na para study ta law. Nate: big smile. I think he either likes the idea or he was saying,‘hahaha pag.solo!’

law of nature

the law of nature dictates that karma will eventually catch up on those that hurt you and they will screw up all by themselves. N0 need for revenge,just sit back and relax..if you’re lucky,God will let you watch.;-)

what's a powerbalance?

powerbalance is a breakthrough techn0logy that uses s0me h0lograms that’s supposed to improve ur balance,strength,flexibility. In short, powerbalance is a very c0ol accessory. It’s bec0me quite p0pular with people at my gym and you might have n0tice s0me sports stars use it. It’s n0t cheap t0o. It ranges fr0m php2000-5000. Be Careful of class A imitati0ns though..fake powerbalance works n0netheless but it’s n0t durable. i got mine for 500 bucks,as expected, the h0lograms disintegrated aftr a few m0nths.hahaha i’m buying an original p0werbalance.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

can't sleep

feels like the creative juices are just overflowing. So many things to do so little time. Paint,sketch,write,read,drama,c0mp0se,sing,sleep,etc. I wish am this smart at law..sigh. I wana sleep!


does he kn0w,does he see, The change kissing u made in me. He’s so gentle nd so kind, he doesn’t want to kn0w what’s 0n my mind. I think of u when i’m with him,these thoughts are hidden deep within. My s0ul is tainted by ur words so pure, my inner chaos only ur kiss can cure. He loves me truly,i saw u only, why did i allow myself to be ths l0nely?he t0uches me yet it’s ur t0uch i crave, how cld u make me ur slave?is this revenge for summer’s kiss,is this my punishment 4 taking away our bliss? “I’m still n0t over you…”-para sa mga kabitera..

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

are u insecure?

are u intimidated by beauty and body?are u feeling rejected because of an0ther?if u r that only means u dnt knw urself,uv d0ne absolutely n0thng in ur life,and u dnt hav inner peace. For if u kn0w who’s within u and if u knw u’v c0ntributed to the world. Beauty nd body is n0thing u should feel inferior t0. Love for self comes fr0m within n0t without..who are they to make u feel less when in ur own life, u are the master.

wish i had an ipad

wish i may,wish i might,have an ipad here tonight. The end of this year is drawing near,i’ve been a terribly g0od girl this year. But an ipad i can’t afford, so i’ll pray to the LORD. I hope s0meone lends an ear,and give me an ipad for christmas next year. winkwink:-*

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Essay in Legal Philosophy Class

Essay in Legal Philosophy
“Rendition Policy: Policy Science Perspective”
By: Marian Jane Alumbro

            There are many schools of jurisprudence presented to us. We are asked by our teacher to choose which school we find an interest in and relate it to present issues or rather figure if they are still applicable in our present time. At first I wasn’t too sure which school of thought I would choose since there are a lot but since I am a political science graduate, I just figured it would make sense if I choose the Policy Science School. Unlike other theories of jurisprudence, it is considered aimed at the global, regional, and national levels of legal orders. The problems addressed in this case are war and peace, turmoil and security.
            Laws, according to this school, are relevant to the predicament in which the world finds itself at the present. These are meant to settle guidelines, strategy or programs adopted by the legal order.
            Policy science, as a school of jurisprudence, is a discipline concerned with the formation, clarification and advocates the realization of social values. Basically this school of jurisprudence is more on the creation and upholding of human rights. This highlights the fact that in many places the efforts in behalf of human rights and freedom have been staffed. This perspective views the law as an instrument to achieve such aims.
            In my understanding, I think this school of thought is the most significant in the current day and most applicable. At the present, social values and human rights have gone down the drain; Issues of war, torture, violence, violation of human rights and chaos have erupted here and there.
            One particular I can relate it to is the issue of rendition or “torture by proxy” as termed by international law experts. Rendition happens when a country hands over their prisoners or suspected terrorists to countries with lax human rights issue where there they are detained and punished behind the scenes. Extradition for fugitives who are charged with a crime is commonly requested by state or county prosecutors. Formal interstate rendition will involve both state governors. Other procedures can involve waiving documentary formalities before surrender of the fugitive. Under the Uniform Extradition Act adopted in 48 states, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands (but not in Mississippi and South Carolina), there is a distinction between fugitives who were in the demanding state at the time of the crime and those non-fugitives whose prior presence is not so alleged.(Source: Wikipedia) This is an example of states regulating their relations between each other by mutual benefit.
            The Bush administration has openly admitted to this practice but declines that there was a specific instruction for torture and as a matters of fact, instructed that it should not be done. However, with the lack of paper work we can never be too sure as to whether or not torture is being committed and the human rights of these captives are actually being respected in the custody of their “proxy captors”.
            Another human rights issue is the recent case of the Red Shirts protestors in Thailand where Downtown Bangkok became a flaming battleground as an army assault forced anti-government protest leaders to surrender, enraging followers who shot grenades and set fire to landmark buildings, cloaking the skyline in black smoke. The army used live ammunition to disperse them, drawing fire from militant Red Shirts. Officials confirmed five protesters and an Italian news photographer were confirmed killed and about 60 wounded. (Source: My only opinion of this is that the army used extreme force against the unarmed civilians. They should have used a more less-forceful way to disperse the crowd. I wonder, where is the “Maximum Tolerance” the army should have used?
            The International Community should unify in promulgating proper laws and sanctioning these countries who think they can get away with doing things under the table or behind the law. Public International Law should be focused more on this issue rather than focusing too much on the economic perspective. I mean yeah, economy and generating GDP is a country’s foremost goal to be able to provide for its citizens but it should also not come at a price of degrading the value of human life. I think they should be more conscious of policy science as a school of thought, that way they would be more conscious of upholding social values and human rights.
            I hope one day, we can solve these problems one-by-one and we are able to live in a world where we respect the rights of other people, where society is ruled not by men but by law. A world where countries are at peace and war is just a distant memory of the past. I wish I would live long enough for that day and hopefully I will die a lawyer who has contributed to the shaping of that kind of world by upholding the law and fulfilling my obligations to my profession, to the court, to my client and to society.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

what's wr0ng with us?!

what’s wr0ng with us y do we kp fyting,u say it’s love bt it just kps on hurting. What’s wr0ng wt u why do u kp thnkng,that im nt true tho i’m tryin..i’m so trying. Wt every pr0mise u break,evry rule i make,every single day,i’m trying to be the best girl bt i end up pushing u away. How Could i still ask u to stay?

Monday, October 11, 2010

i miss you

i miss you because u take my breath away. I miss you because of how we just giggle when we’re t0gethr. How u kiss me nd u just electrify my everybeing. Shatter me to pieces yet i like it. How i miss u yet i kn0w s0mwr s0mhw u are beside me,we’re heading the same path tho apart. I miss u,yes i do..c u s0on

birthday p0em

i knw it must b s0mthng u hate,coz ths myt c0me a little bit late. I tried to call but it myt s0und cheezy,i tried to txt bt it s0unds so easy. So i’m sendng ths instrument written,sgnd nd dated by me. Greeting a happy bday to thee!truly urs,..

Saturday, October 9, 2010

I am a woman...

I am a woman,

I'm not a trophy on display.

I will not shine just for you and please everyone you know. 

I will not just acquire dust as the time passes by where you ignore me 

after you finished putting me on a pedestal.

 I will not acquire rust and stain as the weather takes its toll. 

I am a woman. For unlike a trophy that you won once, you keep forever.

 Ignore me and you will surely lose me again..

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

My theory about the SALUBONG blast 2010...

I really will not believe the SALUBONG blast was because of a frat war..think about it.. where did this frat war idea originate? It was because members of some fraternity picked up a poor law student, formerly DAW a member of a rival frat, and said it was him. Tapos we concluded frat war nga when in the first place, the cause of that theory was wrong. That poor guy was innocent and so frat war it was not!

Why are they not looking at the people living in the surrounding area. There were lots of places there where they were standing above the ground, easy for a person to gain some leverage to throw the pineapple grenade at the crowd. I was there and they were just right above me from where I was standing, at that time I thought it was really easy for any one of them to throw something at the crowd if they really wanted to. A good arm was all it needed.The investigators must be able to locate proper angling as to where the bomb could have been thrown at what distance where the bomber knew he wouldn't be included from the blast. Above the blast site was also the LRT station, anyone could have just dropped the bomb from there. He would have been safe from the blast from there! Anybody checking the LRT station for fingerprints or whatever after that? Motive? I really believe it had something to do with the beer throwing. It wouldn't take much to piss some people off. I mean, they have nothing to lose and a WW2 pineappple grenade is rare but not hard to find, we hear in the news that dormant bomb shells and WW2 paraphernalia being found by a bunch of kids in some places,  i wouldn't be surprised if a scavenger found one while going through a pile of garbage in a landfill somewhere. He/ she probably just kept it and got pissed off coz of the indiscriminate beer throwing or probably the noise and excitement and just threw the darn thing at the place where he finds it most noisy: In the middle of the crowd.

Think about it as well. If this was really premeditated, won't they make a bigger bomb instead? If it was really a frat war, they would make something more destructive to kill and annihilate more members of the rival fraternity. Law fraternities have been in existent as old as the law schools themselves and the Salubong has been a tradition so why would any body try to set up a bomb for that knowing one of their own could be part of that crowd. Unless, you are someone who just wants pure chaos, the magnitude of the blast is too small compared to what something planned out from the beginning could have made.

The type of weapon is also unconventional it wasn't modern as usual bomb makers would make. You can even learn how to make one in youtube! But no, the weapon used was something that was still used in WW2, it could have been kept for a long time before it was used. Even if someone bought it somewhere still the damage it does, does not fulfill the purpose of killing a rival frat. Also, Why use it now? It was the end of the bar examinations. A lot of people were there and they don't know who was among the crowd. Again there could have been someone who is one of their own so why did any of them stick around to "apprehend people" or "be caught" in the first place? If they did plan it out, we wouldn't see them anywhere near there! They would be telling everyone of their group to stay clear or else they might be included in the blast. I think the Salubong Blast was just too random and too unplanned to be a frat war. Well those are just my thoughts for picking.. been watching too much CSI, NCIS and house.. lolz